.

"The 20th century gave rise to one of the greatest and most distressing paradoxes of human history: that the greatest intolerance and violence of that century were practiced by those who believed that religion caused intolerance and violence."

                                                         - Alister McGrath




.

The Reason for God: Keller on Thinking and Philosophy

After reading Timothy Keller's new book The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism, I became poignantly aware of two things.  We don't know as much as we think we do about the world we live in, and we know more than we think we do about God.  I will attempt to expound on both of these conclusions throughout the rest of this blog post, but first let's begin with some introductory facts about the book.

Dr. Timothy Keller has written a 250 page book that essentially contains two parts: an examination of seven major objections to Christianity, and an exegesis about why God does exist and what we should do with that information.  But this is no regular apologetic book about Scripture verses and probabilities.  Keller admits from the outset that he cannot necessarily prove God beyond a shadow of a doubt to everyone.  In fact, he draws a distinction between two methods of logical thought.  The first is strong rationalism, which is the fraudulent belief that someone can actually hold the "view from nowhere", or in other words - a position of pure objectivity.  Since everyone under the sun brings some type of bias into his or her premises and conclusions about the evidence, he rejects this type of logic as a realistic possibility.  Human beings can be rational of course, just not omniscient (in possession of all knowledge on any one subject).  The second method of logic Keller mentions is critical rationality.  It says basically that to any rational argument out there, someone can always find a loop-hole or an escape hatch by employing the right kind of philosophical tactic.  But in spite of this, there are some arguments that many, or even most rational people will find convincing.  And this is the method that Dr. Keller uses in order to collect proofs for God in his book. 

He employs critical rationality to assert things like "you can't evaluate a religion except on the basis of some other ethical criteria that in the end, amounts to your own personal religion."  In other words, you cannot say a belief system is bad, unless you claim to have a better (or more omniscient) knowledge about that subject matter which gives you the right to call it bad in the first place.  This may not be plausible enough for everyone, but it serves to appeal to many as a successful logical assertion.  After reading several chapters on this, I began to wonder if anyone can ever really prove anything!  But then Keller says that because any kind of truth claim denotes a bias or pre-supposition of its own, this simply acts to level the playing field on both sides of the God debate, and reminds us that we are to be humble in our search for answers.  Not aggressive, ruthless, or cruel.    

After leveling the playing field so to speak (by essentially refusing to sink into the realm of the "uber-philosophy nerd" who becomes so caught up in the beauty of their own premises that they miss the forest for the trees), Keller claims that we can know God through a process of clue accumulation.   These clues that point toward a creator - like the finely tuned Earth argument or the universal moral law - can be woven together to provide enough evidence to fulfill critical rationality.  And this, Keller says, will allow us to see that the system of thought which allows for a God, seems to make more sense of the big questions that all of us carry around with us.  Questions like "why am I here" or "what is the purpose to all of this."  Questions that professed atheist Richard Dawkins calls silly and meaningless.  In short, viewing our world through the lens of Christianity makes more sense of things than viewing the world through any other lens. 

Now this is an interesting theory to me.  On the one hand it seems to tell us to stop taking ourselves so seriously with regard to how smart or educated we are, and to realize that strictly speaking, no one can know everything about anything.  Next, however, we need to understand that this is no excuse for intellectual laziness, and we must press on with our attempt to understand the world in which we live.  Finally, this world contains a plethora of evidence that points directly to a creator God.  All of this strikes me as a wake-up call to stop toying around with philosophy, and begin thinking.  Stop loving the beauty of a logical construct, and begin to actually employ one.  If we do this, Keller says we will eventually arrive at God.  I would tend to agree.

Granted, I am probably reading my own bias into his statements.  Fair enough.  But this invoked in me the idea that we need to stop fighting with each other.  Proponents on both sides of the God debate need to 1.) realize that they don't have all the answers, and 2.) be humble in their assessments of the evidence around us.  Once this occurs, we may begin to discuss honestly the possibility of a universe that includes the supernatural component - no matter what side of the equation we come down on.  We don't know as much as we think we do about the world we live in, and we know more than we think we do about God.  Because if He is real, He would have endowed us with the ability to find Him.  But this doesn't mean we will always sufficiently understand Him.  After all, what kind of a God would He be if you and I could build our own logical 'stairway' that was high enough to reach Him completely, thus bringing us together as equals?  This will never happen, it wasn't meant to.  We must be satisfied then, with accumulating the clues that He has left for us, and weaving them together into a tapestry which may not reflect God perfectly - but still be perfect enough to inspire awe.  In this type of framework, there will always be the opportunity to disbelieve.  I think the prospect of finding God, however, is worth that risk.  We have always been free to make up our own minds either way.

This explains why I have always enjoyed a well-structured and thorough talk given by an atheist just as much as a convincing witness given by a true believer.  Because both of them remind me that the human brain can be a beautiful thing.  But we must stop considering ourselves so learned and educated that we can explain away God.  I don't believe an honest account of the clues He has left for us allows for this.  The Bible tells us that He wants us to pursue Him, but it does not recommend testing Him.  Both ventures entail man looking for God, all the while using the intellectual capacity which He has given us in the first place.  But testing Him by way of hiding behind philosophical escape hatches or smoke screens is unwise.  And I think this is the point that Keller was trying to make. 

We know more than we think we do about God because He loves us, and wants us to arrive at Him as our destination.  Better for me to admit He exists, than to play hide-and-seek with intricately developed philosophies and arguments that are fun to discuss, but may fall flat when actually employed.  I will be better off in the long run I think, if I just admit what I see. 




.

God in the Face of Tragedy

"Within a century, the Bible will be extinct."  -  Voltaire (1694-1778)


Fortunately, these words by French philosopher and writer Voltaire have been proven false.  He never lived to see the day when the Bible goes out of print.  It is still one of the most widely sold books in the world.  But I do wonder, what if Voltaire were alive today? What if he turned on his television last week and watched in horror (as we all did) about the shooting at the movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado?  Would this action have bolstered his unbelief, or challenged it?  On July 20th, James Holmes walked into a theatre during a late night showing and began shooting innocent people.  As a blogger and a Christian, I find the urge to write about this event too strong to overcome.  I need to say something.  But I am not going to state only the obvious - that this act was evil and malevolent.  It was.  The fact that Holmes may be mentally unstable does not change the fact that the action was pre-meditated and horrible. We are still faced with the reality of evil, even if the vehicle of that evil was mentally unbalanced and confused.  Nor will I speak about gun control, or lack thereof.  Guns are already here and prevalent in America, we must deal with them.  Instead, I want to talk about something else.


The media covered the facts surrounding the shooting fairly well.  They named the city and movie theatre, they interviewed the witnesses, and they posted a picture of the man accused of this terrible act.  But something seemed to be missing.  As I began to delve a little further into the details of this tragic event, I was amazed by something.  Watch closely to some of the language being used by the victims.  They talk about God and prayer.  They mention faith and hope.  Now mind you, these were the people trapped in the very theatre where Holmes began shooting - they were not armchair quarterbacks, discussing this crime from a safe vantage point after-the-fact (like yours truly).  In short, when it was time to run, these people chose to run to God.  This is remarkable.  


I read a blog posting from a mother who had attended the movie premier that night in Colorado.  In her post she quotes the Bible frequently, upholds the character of Jesus, and maintains that God is still good and merciful.  Good and merciful.  This woman had bullets whizzing by her head 24 hours previous to writing those words.  Friends, I can understand being grateful to be alive, but the mere fact that so many of these people spoke out through prayer and faith was nothing short of amazing.  Where is God when evil occurs?  Apparently, right in our midst, alongside the people experiencing the pain.  


For a short while after the events of September 11th, 2001, I think our nation pulled together in prayer and supplication to God.  In light of events like this, man is left in awe of some people's utter disregard for human life.  Atheism has nothing to say about this.  People run to God.  Not because He is a crutch or some other venue for weakness, but  because when we are afraid (and I mean truly afraid), most of us recognize that greater meaning exists.  Humanity is not just the culmination of evil and chaos.  Instead, we fight past the chaos and search for meaning - that is our way.  The events in Colorado were no different.  That more of this type of thing doesn't happen on a regular basis, I am truly grateful.  That it happens at all, is more than just troubling.    


Christianity has an answer for suffering and evil.  When sin entered into our world, life would never be the same.  The Fall of Man and the Garden of Eden have affected the very fabric of our lives, even thousands of years later.  Many people (even other Christians) believe that these stories where metaphors used in the Old Testament to describe what happens when human beings tell God to mind His own business.  But I wonder just how literal those ancient events may have been.  We suffer because we live in a broken world, surrounded by imperfect people.  But as I have said before in other posts, this answer can seem rather academic sometimes.  This is why I find it much more interesting that many of the people in the theatre that night didn't even bother to make arguments or excuses for God - they simply ran to Him.  They prayed to Him.  And they were grateful for His comfort.  I think there is a lesson here, and I am ready to listen.  


I will add one more thing.  As most of us know, the film being shown that night was The Dark Knight Rises, a gritty, realistic adaptation of the comic-book character Batman.  Director Christopher Nolan is well-known for his portrayal of this character.  The last two Batman films (and from what I hear this one is no different) are cloaked in violence, and they depict the fictional Gotham City as shrouded in fear and moral decay.  I'm not picking on the Batman franchise, or even on Warner Brothers.  But shooting suspect James Holmes has stated to the press that he thought of himself as "The Joker."  What are we teaching our children with these movies?  Should it bother me that a good majority of successful box-office films are violence-filled and rated R?  Does it bother you?  Should it bother us more?


I am grateful that God is good, and He is real.  If I were in the theatre that night with my family, would I still think so?  I can only conjecture and say that I hope so.  I am glad that many of the people who were actually there thought so as well. 






. 

Mark Driscoll on Biblical Justification...

"Paul is clear that our justification is accomplished by Jesus plus nothing, because Jesus plus anything ruins everything" 

                      - from Religion Saves & Nine Other Misconceptions







.

Almost 6,000 Pageviews for the Blog!

A Logical Faith has received 5,770 pageviews since its inception 3-years ago.  Thank you to our loyal readers that have made this accomplishment possible.  I look forward to continuing our journey together to share a good and loving God with the world!

.

A Lifeboat, the Circus, and a Relational Jesus

I just finished the book Searching for God Knows What, by Donald Miller.  I came across this book in a most unusual way.  While vacationing for the weekend on my wedding anniversary last month, my family and I stayed in a hotel in the Des Moines area.  Since I have recently relocated to a small town 100 miles away, the idea of returning to an old familiar stomping ground to stay at a hotel where I knew we would all have fun, sounded great.  One morning, after a free continental breakfast with 60 other hotel guests packed into a room the size of a large closet, I decided to go out for a walk and stretch my legs.  I walked across the street to the near-by movie theatre and went inside.  All three of my children were with me, so I wanted to see if the theatre had an arcade.  Anything to pass some time and keep them busy.  When I walked in, I noticed that a church had set up in the theatre (after all, it was Sunday morning).  I was greeted by a nice young lady behind a folding table with a name tag ... Nicole I think.  She welcomed me in and handed me a new visitor bag, and inside was the book that I mention above.  I let it stay on my desk for a number of weeks after my family and I returned home.  But finally, one night, I cracked it open.  After all, maybe God wanted me to wander into a movie theatre with a church in it and pick up this book, right?

Searching for God Knows What is exactly what the title suggests.  Miller has written this book (I think) for people who are looking for something better than what they currently have, but don't necessarily realize yet what it is they truly need.  Miller is aware that there are many people who have no interest in the church.  He knows that there is a portion of the population that pays no homage to the pious religious types that frequent churches.  Instead, he talks in a straightforward fashion about what it might be like to actually know God, and what this could mean for our lives.  Before you attempt to lump this book into a pile with the rest of the emerging church "God is good, religion is bad" books, I suggest you give it a read.  It really is something unique. 

Donald Miller opens by telling stories from his own past.  He discusses a class he had in elementary school, where his ethics teacher posed a question to the audience.  Her question was this: if you were stranded in a lifeboat with a small group of people, and one person had to be thrown overboard to save everyone else, who would you choose to discard?  I'm not sure that I have ever had a class like this in grade school.  I'm not sure what I would do if my 9-year-old came home and told me about something like this.  It is odd to say the least.  Miller admits that he cannot remember who they decided to throw overboard.  He said that they began asking questions like what were the occupations of the people, how was their physical health, etc.  The idea of each person having his or her own unique value and being equal never came up - only how each person stacked up compared to the other people in the boat.  My daughter recently studied the Titanic in her own 3rd grade class.  I wonder if situations like this actually happened on that night in 1912.  I really do wonder about it.  Would you or I have been tossed into the water?  What would the criteria have been back then?

Miller tells this story to illustrate the point that people nowadays (and in days past also) pay far too much attention to external comments coming from others around them.  If we work hard and someone tells us that we did a good job, then we feel uplifted.  But if the very next day, someone tells us that we could have done a little better, we are devastated.  We are constantly being judged, and in many cases even doing the judging ourselves (whether we like to admit it or not).  This world is our lifeboat, and we are always sizing up the competition.  Sometimes we consider ourselves a winner, and sometimes a loser.  And these  little lifeboat scenarios keep repeating over and over.  Miller argues the reason we do this is because we have lost our direct connection with God ever since the Fall of Man thousands of years ago.  Since the time that Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, our connection to God (at least to some degree) has been impaired.  And so it is that you and I have begun to rely on other people's opinions to define us.  We want desperately to win at the lifeboat game.  We want to be the last one in the raft by the time the Coast Guard comes by with the rescue helicopter.  The best house, the nicest car, the most adept at work ... you get the picture.  The lifeboat presses on.

Miller then switches gears and begins to talk about his memories of the Circus when he was a child.  How stressful it was to watch the trapeze artists, and by contrast, how relaxing it was to watch something as solid and massive as the elephants.  No tight-ropes for these animals.  Just a few cheap gags for the audience, and then back to their cages for food and water.  And when it was over everyone applauded the performers.  If you could walk the high-wire, or ride your motorcycle around and around in a metal cage, or even if you were simply the bearded woman - at least you accomplished something and filled a niche.  People rewarded these circus acts with praise.  His point was this: that we are all running around like we are in a circus.  Performing for one person or another, for one job or another.  Always trying to be the best at something.  To fill a niche.  The joke is on us, however, because the harder we try to obtain "applause" at something, the more we crave other people's opinions.  This is fine as long as we are receiving praise, but it also means we fall that much harder when we experience rejection.  The lifeboat still matters to us.  We run around like monkeys (as Miller says) in this circus, hoping to rise in hierarchy up the ladder and stay in the boat.  I wonder at times, whose boat is it anyway?  God didn't create it.  I think you and I did.  I think we were never meant to exist in a lifeboat.

So how do we escape?  When I was in grade school, I was truly awful at little league.  I'm happy to say that my kids seem to be superstars at baseball, but as for myself - no dice.  I would always throw the ball to the wrong base.  Once I even swear I saw my coach throw his hat on the ground after just such an occasion.  All the while the "grown ups" in the stands going berserk because their little Timmy wasn't able to make the winning play at a baseball game for 4th graders.  At times like this, I would simply go home with my parents and cling to my mother or father for support.  I felt better at home, it always relaxed me.  My mother would cook one of my favorite meals and I would sit by my Dad in front of the T.V., and life would be okay again.  My success didn't come from anything I personally accomplished, but rather from my relationship with my parents.  Searching for God Knows What makes a similar point.  We need to re-establish our link to the God that can rightfully supply us with the only interior voice that matters.  Knowing Jesus is a relational thing, not a quantifiable one.  Miller says on page 161, "In a culture that worships science, relational propositions will always be left out of arguments attempting to surface truth.  We believe, quite simply, that unless we can chart something, it doesn't exist.  And you can't chart relationships." 

Many of us have come to prefer the lifeboat.  At least the pain it provides is comfortable and "reasonable" to us.  It doesn't involve any of this emotional God stuff.  But the problem is that it doesn't accomplish anything in our lives.  If we want to get out of the lifeboat and quit the circus, then the key to our escape lies in our ability to get to know someone, rather than to accomplish something.  And that is the catch.  Miller says that the mystery of the Gospel is that salvation comes through a relational Jesus, and not a rule book Jesus.  Now don't misunderstand.  Miller still mentions baptism and repentance as important components of the Bible, but he mentions them in a way that buttresses a relationship with Christ.  Not in a way that attempts to earn our way to God of our own accord.  The nature of a gift is that you don't earn it, it is merely extended to you.  And this is what God's grace is.  

On the last page of the book Miller gives the following invitation to his readers, "I hope you will join me in clinging to Him."  He is speaking here of holding close to Christ in a truly relational and personal sense.  And I think that is often what we need to do.  When the line between the "churchy" things that need to be done, and the personal things that bring us closer to God becomes blurred, err on the side of simply clinging to Jesus.  Pray to Him, talk to Him, love Him.  It's okay if you don't have a PhD in New Testament theology.  God gives you permission to leave any such placard or diploma behind in the lifeboat.  The closer He draws you to Heaven, the sooner you will begin to see doctrine as a road map which helps you along to something greater, but doctrine is not the greater thing itself.  The end goal is a relationship with God, not just a knowledge about God.  And He doesn't care if you don't always throw the ball to the correct base.

Too bad we couldn't just get away with memorizing Scripture and going to church.  It would seem easier that way sometimes I think.  But then we are back in the lifeboat.   



.

'The God Circle' Book is Here!

Tired of wondering if God is real? Join author Jon Klaus on an exploration of science, reason, and philosophy as he seeks to guide the reader to a place where they can meet God for themselves. 'The... More > God Circle' is a 98 page book which addresses the question: is God and the Christian faith logical?


Click the lulu.com button below to order your copy today!

.

Revisiting Grief

Recently we experienced the loss of one of my son's neighborhood friends.  Derek died of cancer Friday morning at his home, surrounded by his family.  He was seven years old.  He was a sweet, fun-loving little boy that used to ride his Bigwheel up and down the sidewalk in front of our house.  He came over countless times during the summer, and my kids played with both Derek and his sister.  And now he is gone.  All of his human potential has ended in the blink of an eye.  Granted the weeks and months of on-and-off suffering that his family was forced to deal with probably didn't seem like the blink of an eye to them.  My point is that he was playing in our basement one day, and gone the next.  Nothing is permanent.  Not the cars we drive, not the houses we live in, not even you and I. 

There are answers in Christianity for the times when we struggle with suffering.  They may be true, but sometimes they can seem too academic.  This was one of those times.  I was unprepared for the level of grief that I felt when I heard about his death.  It is one thing to attend the funeral of someone in their eighties.  It is something entirely different to see a seven-year-old's blankie draped across a coffin.  I'm not sure what to make of this.  It happens every day in our world of course, because children are mortal too.  But it just feels wrong.  Suddenly I will feel pangs of guilt for the times when I grew frustrated with the kids when they were playing together too loud, or committing some other "crime" that all normal kids take part in.  Suddenly I long to have those times back, so that I could revel in the gift of having the opportunity to get mad about silly things again.  How funny the human condition is that we exist on a linear timeline that often consists of 'sweating the small stuff.'   

I must admit that I am greatly comforted by the story of Jesus equating our entrance into Heaven with having the faith of a child (Matt 18:3).  For children, faith comes so naturally and openly.  As adults we often allow pessimism and pride to get in the way.  Christ reminds us to strip off the garbage, and keep what once came so naturally to us as kids.  I am certain Derek is in Heaven.  Not just because he was baptised, or because he had a religious funeral, but rather because spiritually speaking - he was a straight arrow.  I wouldn't mind one more chance to pat him on the head or watch him playing with my own children again in the backyard.  But that was about to change anyway, even before he got sick again: my family and I are in the process of moving.  Derek would have soon been without my son as a playmate.  In addition, the family just across the street from him had moved three weeks prior.  Maybe that is how God works sometimes.  Derek was here to touch the lives of the other children for a while, and once they moved away, God brought him home.  No more suffering, no more trips to the doctor.  Only peace.

There are a handful of near-death experience studies that were conducted on children during the twentieth century.  It is amazing how so many of them reported the same thing.  They could feel themselves die, and then all of a sudden they were in the presence of Jesus.  Many of the kids even reported details like Christ was wearing a red sash around his upper body (you will note that this description also shows up in the recent story of Colton Burpo from the book Heaven is Real).  I like this mental picture.  I imagine Derek walking next to a tall, kind gentleman wearing a red sash. 

Am I being too poetic here?  Too Pollyanna?  I don't think so.  I think grief and pain itself are often indicators of the reality of Heaven and God.  To suffer so acutely seems to demand a greater Good from which a lack or disconnection from that Goodness can  become offensive. But why is it so offensive?  Why do we get so angry and so grief-stricken when something like this happens?  Because we know that human-kind is meant for something better.  This separation feels unnatural because it is unnatural.  Deep down our spirit knows Heaven already, and the stark contrast of this world compared to that one is repugnant to us.  We can have joy in the fact that if we know Jesus, Heaven awaits us.  Notice I said we can have joy, not always comfort.  During certain times in our life there may in fact be very little consolation from religion, but there can always be joy from God.  Some of you will know exactly what I mean here. 

I am not sure if there is a moral here, save to say that only God lasts forever.  If we place our faith in anything else (money,  work, individualism, etc) we will eventually be disappointed.  None of those things will follow us after we die.  None of it will follow us or wait for us on the other side, but God does wait.   He waits for us to accept Him in this life, to take part in the way we live here on planet Earth, and He waits to greet us when our time is up.  If this were not the case, then our species would truly be without hope.  

Derek has moved on.  It is up to the rest of us who knew him to continue living, and to attempt to process the things that have happened.  I suspect I will picture him riding his Bigwheel up and down the sidewalk in front of our home for some time to come, even once we are in our new house.  Forgive me if I make it a point to also picture him riding alongside someone wearing a red sash.




.  

.

"I don’t know how to prove God to you. I can only hope to guide you to a place where you and God might meet."



                                 - Erwin McManus


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.

Obedience: Cause & Effect

I would like to take a moment to share a short story with you.  A few weeks ago, I had the great privilege and ability to tithe (give 10% of your wealth to the church) on a portion of income that I had received.  I cannot make the assertion that my family is always able to do this - I wish I could.  This particular time, however, I made it a point to follow through, and I wrote a check for the full ten percent to our local church.

What happened next was very interesting.  In fact, if we look to the Bible in the book of Malachi (chapter 3, verse 10), it says this: "Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this,” says the LORD Almighty, “and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it."  And bless us He did.  Not more than 45 minutes after cutting the check, I received a call from my wife informing me that we had been pre-approved for a home loan at a superb interest rate. 

Could these two events have been coincidental?  The skeptic would say yes.  Its true, God didn't send an angel from Heaven, riding a lightening bolt, to deliver the news about our loan.  But come now, doesn't it make you wonder?  Some would ask, "but you have only been pre-approved, its not a done deal yet."  That is correct.  However I believe both of these skeptical assumptions presume two things: 1.) God surely couldn't have done this, and 2.) circumstances need to be drawn out to their full and verifiable conclusion before we can give God any credit.  To the first presumption I would have to answer, "yes, God could have done this, and in fact does do this for people on a regular basis."  To the second presumption, I would answer that even if we get all the way through the process and begin moving into our new home ... would that be enough proof?  There is always an out if you look hard enough.

I am of the opinion that God simply fulfilled His promise in Malachi 3:10 that day.  We tithed, and He rewarded.  Now it is true that God is not a giant ATM in the sky.  Others may not have this same result, and this may very well not be the outcome all of the time when you tithe. But I enjoy being reminded that the Bible is true, and I thought a segment of you readers out there may appreciate this post also.  

Praise be to God, and I'm sure I will be blogging for you again soon, from the office in our new home.



.

Why is Christianity Special?